Hmm…Maybe in this series of Star Trek movies, it’s the odd numbered ones that are better!
Spock, Jaylah, and McCoy face adversaries in “Star Trek Beyond”
I went to see Star Trek Beyond the other week, going in not sure what to expect, especially since the first trailer left me a little concerned. Its impression suggested that Beyond would be nothing but action-action- action. To my delight, this is not the case. Instead, Beyond has a style that is way more in tune with the original series. Introspection is a key element, but the viewer isn’t beaten over the head with it. Like the previous Into Darkness, there is reference to the original series, but unlike Darkness, it is refreshingly subtle, sometimes humorous and most importantly, respectful. This makes Beyond far more enjoyable for old and new fans alike. (And yes, there’s plenty of action too).
The adventure opens with Kirk attempting to give a peace-offering to a race of beings who glare down at him from a cliff. His ambassador skills fail in way so comical, it’s no wonder he doubts his ability as captain, (now three years into the Enterprise mission). And Kirk isn’t alone with his doubts. Spock’s relationship with Uhura is strained, and he’s apprehensive for his future with Starfleet, especially since receiving the sad news of Spock Prime’s death.
The Enterprise answers distress signal, but it leads to trouble and threatens whole Earth in doing so. The crew finds themselves split apart, their beloved ship destroyed. This may sound like tried and true Trek trope, but it makes the characters boldly go where the two previous movies didn’t; forcing them into confrontations with their own mortality, and questioning their worth.
We see crew members paired off after they’re scattered on the harsh planet of Altmid, facing their fears together. Spock and McCoy, Kirk and Chekov, Uhura and Sulu, and most notably, Scotty and Jaylah. As they work together to find their way home, friendships become bonds and they realize that their obligations to their starship family goes well beyond duty, but to survival itself.
The cast has evolved in as any acting family would in a nearly 10-year space (!) since this reboot began. Chris Pine has grown a bit more serious and much less frat-boy into his depiction of Kirk, better fitting his character . Zachary Quinto’s reveals subtle layers of Spock as a Vulcan still learning to hide his emotions. His inner struggle leads to a very funny moment when he is injured, which leads Karl Urban’s delightful Bones to utter “My God, he’s delirious!” Zoe Saldana’s Uhura is kick-ass class at it’s best, and a strong role model for young women, as is Sofia Boutella, as the lone fighter, Jaylah. It’s bittersweet to see Anton Yelchin in his last outing as Chekov, he is as charming and as smart as ever, but hasn’t nearly enough time on screen as I wished he would. I give props to Simon Pegg, whose screenplay written with Doug Jung, gives Scotty a lot more adventure to bite into this time. They’ve also added subtle backstory to Sulu (John Cho) as we briefly see his husband and daughter. The writing team has added a lot of the warmth back into the series without being smarmy. It also deals with the the emotional tug of war that becomes an all-powerful being, as Krall (Idris Elba) has become. One suspects there more to Krall than his merciless destruction, and eventually we discover his tragic core. It’s classic Trek storytelling, with moral consequences. And yes, there’s a touching homage to Spock and the original crew too. <3
My one complaint here is a cosmetic one. Spock’s Vulcan haircut is too darn short! It needs to sprout a little more above his ears and have sharper sideburns!
Looking forward to seeing this again, and I urge all of you who have abandoned the reboot after the much shunned Darkness to come back and see how our beloved Star Trek can be true to itself again. This Star Trek has come home to its TOS roots, and I cannot think of a better way to honor the original series in its golden anniversary.
I see a brief trailer has been released for the new TV version of Star Trek. It’s just fancy CGI, dramatic music, exploding planets and asteroids, but at the end we hear the first familiar chords of the classic Trek fanfare. It promises “New Crews, New Villians, New Heroes, New Worlds”.
Then, for a moment, it gave me a ray of hope, stating:
“Premiering January 2017 on CBS.”
What’s this? Have The Powers That Be finally decided to air the new Trek for all to see on Broadcast Network TV? But wait, no…
“And coming to CBS All Access”.
Crap! Apparently the network will only give us one episode and soak us for the rest. I don’t know about you, but I’m sick of Trek fans being fleeced whenever a new Trek project arises.
There’s a petition on Care2 petitions that demands that CBS make Trek free for all, and I agree. It’s only a little over halfway to it’s goal of 1000, let’s take it over the top!
In the meantime, let’s hope this one will be true to Gene’s vision.
Okay, so a hundred years and 25 or so revisions later, I’m finally getting this review out! I know by now there’s been plenty of debate and stir over the latest JJ Abrams version, but if you don’t mind one more, here, just in time for the blue-ray release, is my two cents. (Yes, there will be SPOILERS) Thanks for your patience.
Spock (Zachary Quinto) and Kirk (Christopher Pine) are snared again by lens flares in Star Trek Into Darkness.
On a scale of 1-5 stars I give it almost 4 (Like 3 and 7/8ths) ) 3. Did I like it? Yes. Did I love it? Not as much as I hoped I really would. Obviously the writers and Abrams are taking the original series where no franchise has gone before; into it’s own damn idea of what Gene Roddenberry had in mind. Some of its impulses were good. Others, not so good. Thisreview questions some of those impulses. (And yes, there was a lot of good too).
The story got off to an exciting start, with a classic, if somewhat preposterous, Enterprise-saving the-day-venture. Kirk rescues Spock by avoiding The Prime Directive, which foreshadows the climax of the film. This Trek is a lot edgier and action-based than the original series ever was, no doubt aiming for the all-powerful 18-24 demographic. Fortunately it isn’t too far into these extremes, and still retains the wit and familiarity of the original series. First, the bad:
As an old Trekkie, I found the extra-large action aspect mildly bothersome, but what mostly upset me was the blatant recycling of a storyline that was best told in Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan. Come now, writers, surely you could have written the (spoiler) Kirk death scene in a new, dynamic way, not rehashing Spock’s death in ST:IInearly word for word! I found that whole scene a slap in the face to ST:II. I mean sure, Spock has to face that his friend Kirk is in mortal danger trying to save the ship, but I can’t help but wonder how much better that scene would have been if it approached the same situation with original dialogue! After all, THIS Spock has not known THIS Kirk as long as the originals. Of course Spock would try to save his friend and captain, but the lifted dialogue from Wrath…just made the scene lazy and a retread instead of the heart-wrenching agony it SHOULD have been. (On a minor point, I’ve always wondered why there are never any haz-mat suits in that most dangerous reactor area, heck even Spock wore gloves in Wrath…!)
And then there’s Khan himself. When the rumors flourished before the release that the villain might be Khan, I didn’t want to believe it because I thought, no, why would they mess with a perfectly good story that’s been told so well once before? When it turned out that the rumors were true, and when Harrison revealed his true self, all I could think was…
Really now, I enjoy and respect Benedict Cumberbach as an actor; (I just recently discovered Sherlock, which I love,) and I do agree that he made a deliciously sinister Khan. But when one imagines Khan Noonian Singh, a pasty, blue-eyed Englishman does not come to mind. I also find myself wishing that my original speculation of Cumberbach and Alice Eve possibly playing Gary Mitchell and Dr. Elizabeth Dehner had come to pass. I think it could have been just as exciting with these two characters, (who suffered with a god complex) and it would have been nice to see more into their characters than we did in the original pilot. Alas.
Now why this had to be another revenge movie and not the beginning of the 5 year mission was quite frustrating. It’s plot was so similar to the first reboot it begs the question that perhaps Hollywood has forgotten how to be original and just duplicates the same formulas over and over. Star Trek deserves better than this. And I’m sure this is just me, because I’ve only seen it once, but I can’t even remember WHY Khan needs revenge in this one — and against Kirk? After reading this summary I recalled how somewhat convoluted the first part of the story was that led up to Khan needing revenge. The original episode of Space Seed and it’s sequel STII gave a simpler, plausible explanation of Khan’s angst, but this telling was a can of worms that depended more on action than the philosophies of a superman.
There were other instances that irked me too…
Spock’s flagrant violence. Look, I know Spock is younger here, and still learning to control his emotions, but this is now two movies where his ‘passions’ are stirred enough to make him incredibly violent. (that is, attempting to beat Khan to death) I just don’t find this true to the Spock character. Where was his logical reasoning?
Seeing Kirk in bed with two catwomen was (although comical) also frustrating as this version of the franchise is turning Kirk into more of a horny frat boy than mature man. More of the frat boy mentality ensues with the gratuitous underwear shot of Dr. Marcus, carrying on the custom started in the first reboot with Uhura in her bra.
The suggestion that Christine Chapel had a (disastrous) fling with Jim Kirk, apparently the catalyst that sent her into Starfleet Nursing School (this is so bogus!) I guess there’s no Roger Korby in this universe, and Chapel has yet to set her eyes on Mr. Spock. (Although I could swear her name was mentioned in the first Trek movie in a sickbay scene)
Spock screaming “Khaaaaaaan!” was the nail in the coffin of the death scene. It was beyond laughable, and it was tragic. Not because Spock is heartbroken over Kirk’s demise, but because it is more of Abrams’ writers saying “Hey old Trekkies, (wink-wink), aren’t we clever? See Spock is screaming just like Kirk! It made me cringe. Apparently the writers think they were paying homage to Wrath, but in fact they made it just a parody. Please.
The Enterprise can function under water? Seriously?? It made for an exciting opening, but the semantics seemed totally wrong!
A Starfleet ship called the U.S.S. Vengeance — Seriously?
The convoluted plot leading Khan to be the an arch enemy. He’s bad/ no he’s good/no, he’s bad and he can crush heads!
Damn lens flares! One thing I loved about the old series was the soft and colorful lighting that created an inviting environment on the Enterprise. The production values here have kept the bright, happy, shininess of the Trek universe, and an occasional lens flare would have given it some kick, but to be continuously bombarded by flashing lights shows Abrams continued lack of respect for the quieter atmospheric lighting of the original. Sure the bridge is an exciting place, but not a disco. (Besides, how could one work comfortably w/all those flares?)
Of course I realize that creating a movie requires a lot of hard work and commitment, and despite my problems with this venture, I do appreciate all the work that went into this. I’m still thankful that we have this reboot, and that there will surely be a sequel. There were a many things I liked too. The Klingons helmets were cool. And Karl Urban so delightfully channels Dr. McCoy that I’m certain De Kelley is smiling d0wn on him from Heaven! Also happy to see Spock Prime, if only for a minute. And to be fair, there were some thought-provoking moments and good drama early on in the film. But the best thing about STID was the humor. Here’s some of the best one-liners:
McCoy: “You know, when I dreamed about being stuck on a deserted planet with a gorgeous woman, there was no torpedo.”
Sulu: “Attention: John Harrison. This is Captain Hikaru Sulu of the USS Enterprise… You have two minutes to confirm your compliance. Refusal to do so will result in your obliteration. And If you test me, you will fail.” McCoy: “Mr Sulu, remind me never to piss you off.”
Kirk: “Wait, are you guys… are you guys fighting? Uhura: I’d rather not talk about it, sir… ” Kirk: “Oh my God, what is that even like?” [Spock appears at the turbolift door and Uhura walks past him] Kirk:[as he walks past Spock] “Ears burning?
Kirk: (regarding Spock) Sometimes, I just want to rip the [pauses] bangs off his head!
Scotty: “If it isn’t Captain James Tiberius Perfect-Hair!”
Bones: “Are you out of your corn-fed mind?”
Scotty: “One day I’ve been off this ship! One bloody day!”
Of course, Star Trek does not thrive on humor alone. The one piece of dialogue that mirrors my view of this current incarnation is this:
Kirk: “Mr. Chekov, did you break my ship?”
A funny line, to be sure, but perhaps that should be:
“Mr. Abrams, did you break my Star Trek?”
My main concern about this reboot is that new Trek fans will lose sight of what Star Trek was all about, and think that this wall-to-wall action is what it was always like. There are already fans out there who will never see the original (if cheaper looking) special effects of the original because the new digital restorations have removed most of the beautiful original matte paintings of the original, and have even shortened some scenes (think Spock’s beam out from Vulcan in Amok Time) to make room for more of the digital art. Sure the sets were cheap and the effects crappy, but most of the original was less concerned with it’s special effects than its soul.
I am hoping and praying that the next Trek movie will PLEASE bring us closer to the spirit of the original — it’s about missions and exploring new worlds, (in an allegorical fashion) and tapping into the souls of the original characters. Indeed, the more I see how this movie series is aiming toward more and more ACTION, I am more convinced that this reboot would be served far, far better as a new TV SERIES. After all, the main point of Star Trek was NOT all-action-all-the-time, it was morality tales wrapped as science fiction. Star Trek also had key drama and soul in it’s best tales (Think The City On the Edge of Forever and Journey To Babel) and consider how so many of the best Dramas today are NOT multi-plex slugfests, but thoughtful, mature, and riveting TV series (mostly on cable, like Mad Men and Breaking Bad).
I seriously wish that Paramount would consider turning this Star Trek reboot back into the the format it worked in best: Television, preferable cable or even Netflix where it could thrive without the restrictions of broadcast television. Could you imagine how great it could be if we saw this cast and this Enterprise on a weekly basis — it would be worth every cent to have this rebooted cast grow and emerge as a great drama ensemble, not just a shoot-em-up summer blockbuster every few years. (Besides, Leonard Nimoy isn’t getting any younger, and I want to see how Spock Prime brings back New Vulcan!) That would make Trek shine again as the cornerstone of sci-fi entertainment that it was destined to be. Please Paramount, Bring this version to TV where it belongs. Keep the whole cast (except maybe for Scotty’s little pal) and please lets pick up where The Original Series left off.
By the way, I did pre-order this movie on Amazon (1/2 price), I hope if maybe I watch it a few more times, I’ll like it better, and maybe I will. But in the meantime, I implore all unborn Trekkies to please just watch the original 79. Enough said.
Hey kids, I just got this in the mail today, and it seemed appropriate since I (oddly) just had a dream about the new Jim Kirk and the old Mr. Spock last night! Good article. Can’t wait for the next movie!